Please enter a search term to begin your search.
Opinions contained in The Iona Blog are not necessarily those of The Iona Institute. The Iona Blog is open to anyone who broadly shares the views of The Iona Institute. If you wish to post a comment on a relevant topic please email 200 – 400 words to email@example.com and it will be considered for inclusion in the blog.
The Mater hospital is being pressured by the new abortion law into abandoning its pro-life ethos. In his column in last Friday's Irish Independent, David Quinn argues that this isn't only a battle about abortion, it's also a battle about the autonomy of civil society.
The Mater hospital is required by the newly passed Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act to perform abortions under certain circumstances. This includes the suicide ground. Fr Kevin Doran, a member of the board of the Mater, said the law clashed with the ethos of the hospital. The Iona Institute released a statement today defending Fr Doran.
The issue of our schools featured at this week’s MacGill summer school including in speeches by Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly (pictured) and Labour TD Aodhan O’Riordain. Unlike O’Riordain, O’Reilly has a nuanced line on the Catholic Church, nonetheless she seems to disapprove of the fact that at independence the State ‘outsourced’ the teaching of the nation’s children to the State.
David Quinn appeared on the Vincent Browne Show last night to discuss the ‘liberal agenda’. Also on the panel were John McGuirk, Cllr Bríd Smith of People Before Profit and Niamh Hourigan of UCC. The presenter was Tom McGurk. The panel discussed the effects of the liberal agenda on Ireland, both from a social and economic point of view. David Quinn focused in particular on liberalism’s effect on children.
President Higgins’ decision to sign the Government's abortion legislation, rather than refer it to the Supreme Court, gives rise to mixed feelings. On the one hand, had he decided to refer the Bill, it would have delayed its implementation, and given some hope that it might never become law, or at least not in its present form.
The other day I blogged about a new website in America that allows those who went through divorce as children, but are now in adulthood, to recount their often very painful and bitter experiences. I then tweeted it. Here is what Labour councillor Niamh McGowan tweeted in reply: “Like parents who make the difficult decision to separate really need this guilt inducing nonsense.”
A new study, reported in the New York Times, confirms that children who grow up in areas with higher than average levels of marriage and higher than average levels of religious practice are more likely to be upwardly mobile in later life. According to the study, some of the favoured ways of tackling poverty such as larger tax credits for the poor and higher taxes on the affluent seem to improve income mobility only slightly.
Elizabeth Marquadt is the author of ‘Between Two Worlds: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce’. Elizabeth herself is a child of divorce and grew up shuttling back and forth between the two houses of her divorced parents. This is the experience of many children of divorce. Now a brand new blog has been established by the Ruth Institute called simply, ‘Divorce Stories’ which bears out that these children do indeed live 'between two worlds'.
Just when you thought that the culture couldn't get any more sordid, you read a piece that makes you realise that things are a lot worse. This New York Times article explains that not only are US college students not waiting until marriage to have sex, or even waiting for Mr or Mrs Right, they aren't even waiting for a relationship of any description. Welcome to the hook-up culture.
Lucinda Creighton's principled stand against her own Government's abortion Bill was widely seen as an act of rare political courage, even by some who disagreed with her position. Some have suggested that not only was she sacrificing her job as Minister for Europe, but a promising future in politics.
My latest column in The Irish Independent explains how Irish voters were manipulated into supporting abortion legislation by poor reporting, twisted media coverage of the medical facts and the bullying tactics employed by Fine Gael towards its own TDs. However, the passage of this Bill is by no means the end of the story. There is the prospect now of another party, plus the pro-life movement will do its best to ensure its own supporters do not forgot what has happened.
In last night's marathon debate on the Government's Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013, Lucinda Creighton gave one of the most thoughtful and thorough speeches. She provided an in depth analysis of the medical and legal flaws in the Bill.
Presumably Enda Kenny does not want to create a political party to rival Fine Gael. But if he did, he couldn't do better than the job he's doing now. We learned this weekend that not only did Mr Kenny make an electoral promise to protect Ireland's pro-life laws, they actively courted the pro-life movement in advance of the last General Election.
On Monday, all eyes in the Dail were on Lucinda Creighton in anticipation of what she would have to say on the issue of the abortion Bill. She did not disappoint those who hoped she would express her opposition to the Bill.
One of America’s most noted philosophers is Thomas Nagel of New York University. Nagel is an atheist, but lately he has set a very large cat among his fellow atheists by dissenting from their reductionist, materialist doctrine which, among other things, denies the existence of free will. He did it with his latest book, a slim volume called ‘Mind and Cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost false’.
I’ve been reading some of the contributions made in the Dail so far as part of the debate on the abortion Bill. Several stand out for all the wrong reasons. The worst I’ve come across so far is from Education Minister, Ruairi Quinn. He told the House, “this Bill, when enacted, will still not be compulsory”.
On Tuesday The Iona Institute held a conference on child-care prompted by the recent Prime Time programme on this topic. The keynote speaker was Jonas Himmelstrand, a critic of the Swedish daycare system. He was interviewed by Drivetime on Monday. The next day, Drivetime interviewed a number of participants at the conference to give a flavor of the event.
Writing in today’s Irish Times (Letters) psychotherapist Joseph Flanagan indulges in the by now semi-obligatory go at the Catholic Church. The context is the current abortion debate. He accuses the Church of trying to “control this nation’s moral judgement” and of being “hysterical” in its reaction to the abortion bill. He brings up the issue of clerical sex abuse for good measure.
Last week, two cases emerged in the UK which highlighted the continuing assault on religious liberty and freedom of conscience. The Greater Glasgow and Clyde section of the NHS announced that it is to appeal Scotland’s supreme civil court ruling that two Catholic nurses would not have to delegate, supervise or support staff involved in abortions.
Stephen Collins, the respected political editor of The Irish Times, has a real bee in his bonnet about the Church’s interventions in the abortion debate. A few months ago he suggested that the bishops’ interventions were practically subversive and the Government had to resist at all costs in the name of democracy. Now he is saying that in publishing the abortion bill the Government has finally realised Daniel O’Connell’s dream of separating Church and State.
Showing 141 - 160 of 680 Articles | Page 8 of 34